frens i don't know what is the meaning of constitutional assembly ? can anyone make me clear. how is it done ? what is it ? and how can be it possible for all to solve problem? what is this ? let me know if anyone have good idea.

according to last census held in nepal only about 60% people are educated, educated mean who have passed SLC. in that 60% how many of them know the meaning of constitutional assembly ? and what about that 40% ? last scientific census held by himal khabarpatrika about 65% people want constitutional king, they don't want complete abolishment of monarchy. so majority don't want king to go completely. 90% people were against the direct rule of king.

so, i think this mass in kathmandu and in other places do they even know what is constitutinal assembly ? do they know who are participating and helping this movement, what is that thing ? may be they are just like me, they don't like kings direct rule but want king to be ceremonial.

i am not royalist but if i should vote then i would say ceremonial king. what is constitutional assembly ?

Just to correct you "thopa" educated in Nepal does not means who have passed SLC but who know how to read and write only. The percentage of population in Nepal who have passed SLC in Nepal is not more than 30%.

Thopa, you may be asking about Constituent Assembly. It is basically holding a new election to nominate members who will then draft a new constitution.

And the King and the Royalist won't let it happen because if it happens the new constitution may declare Nepal a democratic state where head of the state will be a elected president not the king.
And king knows that if that happens then he will be ousted.

oh ok thanks

deshbhaktanepali ji thanlks for correcting me and telling something usual but i think that percentage 30, i guess it has increased little bit in those days i mean after 2046. isn't it ? useful information is welcome

icanfly not democratic i think u mean to say republic, democratic republic. in demo there will be king cause its demo

Thopa, I think you got from ShresthaN, what basically Constituent Assembly is.

Not let's go to ceremonial king. In order to have ceremonial king also, we need constituent assembly as the present constitution 2047 has give a loop hole like article 127 that the king uses frequently to rape the constituent itself.

So, in new constitution, there shouldn't be anything like dhara 127.

Do you believe that most of the Japanese people don't know the name of their king? Yes, that kind of king is ceremonial king whose existence is about NIL.

People, who advocate for ceremonial king, if you are a ordinary objective Nepali, think one more time. Does Gyane have that charisma to be worthy of a ceremonial king? Does Paras have that? How many times Gyane interpreted the constitution to benefit his way?