Paras has killed people, he is a parasite and he is part of the criminal Shah dynasty - so what does that make the Maoists?

if paras killed 2 the maost killed 20,000 so what does that make your comparision look like? Don't compare a mole to a mountain.

?

grgdai good logic

Je paayo tehi comparison. How can a person (Paras) be compared to a group of people (maoist) ?

fooking no paras is bad and Maoists are worst...

Paras lai suppert garne hau Birgung tira Nara Launa gaye hunchha, good comparision America Basera Maoist and Paras, both are dangerous but worst comparision.

Here are some jobs for us if we were in Nepal.

Maobadi ko andolan ma gaye bhayo,
Maobadi manpardaina bhane Trichandra ko Nebisang ma gayera andolan gare bhayo,
Congress man pardaina bhane birgung ma paras ji aunu bhayeko chha,
Teta lagera dui char wata nara lagaye bhayo,
Teso garna interest chhaina bhane,
Trichandra ma hat katiyeka samip baral ji lai bhetna model hospital gaye bhayo,
Hoina bhane tare hotel ma gayera neta ko bahas sune bhayo
Politics ma man pardaina bhane tudikhel ma badam ra suntala khana gaye bhayo,
Ani yeso taruni herdai newroad tira lagere ek dui wata dance bar cabin hudai din chhari sake bhayo,
Ki kaso, ma kata jau khai.



Put in the category yourself, because we are Nepali and we are smart enough to maker other bad and our self good.

Paras is better than maoists. Maoists are uneducate, and  do not have good system than Paras has.

Look on Prachand what a dirty guy. can't make a good system in his own life then how can he control country. But honestly i can say about Babu Ram Bhattrai. If a chance give to him may be he can create a good system for country. But still i am not sure because he only able to do his life may be fail to do for country.

Nepalese Monarch were always Nationalist If King Birendra and Gyanendra both of them had choosen to be as Bhutan's King Prachande Girija haruko केही दाल गल्दैनथियो but they were so nationalist they handed power to Nepali Peoples rather to bow to Soniya Gandhi but its Nepalese peoples दुर्भाग्य Leaders Girija,Prachande,Makune etc  are competeting who becomes LENDUP DORJEE quicker.I would like to Chalenge PRACHANDE  if he has guts or so popular just stand in election from Morang,Sunsari,Siraha,Dhanusa ........any District from tarai.At least in Panchayat era  from morang Nagendra Prasad Rijal,from Sunsari Dil Bhadur Shrestha from Siraha Krisna Charan Shrestha and Dhanusa Hem Bahadur Malla and many more from Terai District Pahade used to elected  and no one dare to take oath of office in Hindi .

We were Hindu Nation as Britain is Constitutionaly Christian(Janani of Parliamentary democracy) and country with 10% Hindu Population BanglaDesh is Muslim, but here in Nepal Prachande and company ko lai lai ma lager asati moro Girijale Rastrapati hun paula bhaner Dharma na manne dasaima babuko hathko tiko samet nathapne Gai goruko masu khane asati moro Prachandeko lai lai ma lager DHARMANIRPEKCHHYA ghosana garayo.

There is no question who is better...rather you can ask who is worse and who is worst....

Three words: "Choose Your Poison"

Shah Dynasty became dysfunctional about 150 years ago. Thus Junga Bahadur was able to seize power. Something noteworthy here, there has not been an able ruler or regent since PN Shah, Bahadur Shah, and Junga Bahadur. Folly and whim had become so pervasive within the Shah clans, it is quotable that one Queen set up plots and/or massacres just because somebody or some group killed her favorite lover, Gagan Singh, I believe his name was. Internal strifes after internal strifes preceded or followed Junga Bahadur's reign. Post Junga Bahadur's favorite brother's reign, the latter's sons completely vanquished the massive resistance put together by Junge's own sons resulting in so much bloodshed that even Goddess Kali would have been overwhelmed. This kind of extreme rivalry amongst themselves was gradually pushing them toward their own demise as there is a saying by W. Durant ""A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within."
The Shah dynasty we saw until summer of 2001 is a perpetual in-breeding between the Shahs and the Ranas. If any individual among them would have been wise enough to bring about consensus among themselves, then they would still have been enjoying the fruit out of the seed their ancestors had sowed. Alas, just anchoring the Crown upon a seemingly fool-proof instrument like a religion (Hinduism here) did not prove to be good enough for the Shah Dynasty's eternal rule.
They should have revamped the dynasty by learning from a model Machiavellian who is mostly credited with putting an end to all the violences within the Cosa Nostra during the 50s or 60s and then generating more cash than General Steels and wielding as much power as a Government.
A takeaway here is : beginning or end of a ruling dynasty comes with a lot of deceit and bloodshed and we have seen it all, from the Kiratas to the  Lichchhavis, from the Mallas to the Shahs/Ranas.

no comparison, Paaras is 100000 zillion times better than randi ko chhoro maoists.