Problem Specification :

It should be understood that nepal’s problem lies in the form of social disparity leading to an unjust society and an unjust nepal altogether—the crux of the problem in Nepal. If we envision the eminent social difference of our society in geometrical terms, the structure turns out to be an upright pyramid—a solid figure with a polygonal base at the top and triangular faces that meet at a common point at the bottom. The common point is the “monarchy” which is at the base and hence is the root of the social problem. The supporters, loyalists and cadre of King who sleeps and wakes up with him each day come next and hence comprise the second level of the pyramidal hierarchy. Their supporters in turn fill the next level, so on and so forth. This is a “food chain” of Nepal. The “samantis” of village who suck the blood, toil and sweat of poor and “dalits” also fall in this chain as primary/secondary or tertiary parasites.

As we know, Nepal has been ruled by shah dynasty for more than 250 years now—reason is, their ancestor united the kingdom so they should/must have a share of it. The regime did not even care for think of the poor, let alone devising plans for reforming the social structure. Despite this bitter fact about monarchy, all we have been doing is reading big history books on the bravery and courage of Prithvi N. Shah and his successors.

What we did not realize is that this century old regime has injected “hormones of anti self confidence and anti self-reliance” on us. We fail to envisage our existence without the meta-master (the King). Even after so much of changes in the past few years, we deny to live independently. We may have failed to realize it but there is a problem among us—lack of confidence!

Solution :

Dismantle the pyramid and establish a common one level structure with zero altitude and no hierarchy-- a structure which can house a “dalit” in sheer comfort–a structure which can give madhise an ever lasting respite—a structure which can let “mahila” and “janajati” to live with equal rights which they have been craving for centuries.

Step 1:

Follow “bottom up approach” to dismantle the pyramid. Target and destroy the king, his cadres will succumb to the pressure of vacuum created at the top hierarchy. A chain reaction will be induced which will grow with time and will eventually kill the existence of the “samantis” of the society.

Declare Nepal a democratic republic in the preamble of the interim constitution. Or, hold a referendum and let people decide the monarchy’s fate.

Step 2:

Restructure the state. Change the unitary state system into a federal state system based on regional autonomy.

Step 3:

Impart free education to the people.

Step 4:

Enforce quota system and let dalits come into the equation of equal opportunity.


In Nepal, monarchy is a regressive force, parliamentary parties or the SPA are forces at status quo, and maoists are a progressive force. If there is someone who has represented Nepal in its entirety, then they are maoists. They raised the necessity of CA back in 1990 when nepali congress (thanks to their visionary leaders) and UML came up with a rather weak constitution. Maoists asked for democratic republic when other parties were busy licking and kissing the monarch. It took 10 years for the parliamentary parties to come to the place where Maoists actually started their mission from. Now that is what visionary leaders with the likes of Baburam and Prachanda are up to.

In a nutshell, “Bahudaliya Janabad” is what we are heading into through Prachandapath. You cry or laugh about it but that is the truth and is going to decide the fate of Nepal. Don’t think that Maoists will come out as conventional communist leaders to impose monolithic communism in Nepal. They know that Mao Zedong's People's Republic and cooperative party theory cannot fulfill the needs of today's world. It cannot address today's political awareness appropriately. They are into what they call “competitive party theory” which can assure their success in 21st century.

Yes, Maoists are indeed on a role!

LooTe

P.S. Let's analyse the situation with LOGICS. Please wait until late afternoon for my response though, I am gonna JUSTIFY Maoists violence too!! hehe...

hahahahaha..as expected ..loote in action..for the maoist..hahaha..trick worked huh !!loote..

Indeed a role model for violence!!!No doubt!!

will answer what role model is maoist when i have time in detail + where maoist are going to take nepal with this hyped dream Role model also...hmmm..i was waiting you in my thread ...maoist way or the highway ...hahahah:P

when someone told the world was round...there were many many intellingent people who laughed....can't fix a stupid..

agreed: you are absolutely right in saying that Maoists will not emerge as traditional hardliner communists simply because they can not:

They are clever enough to grasp the reality that all hard-linear communism can fail eventually even in 2-4 years like what happened with Khemerrouz in Combodia, because they know that neither Nepali people nor international communities support oppressive traditional communism. Only thing Nepali people want now is "justice" in terms of opportunities and they are all aware (except some people who consider ordinary Nepali people as animals and want to treat them as animals forever) that it can be achived through rooting out monarchy and restructuring the state.

In fact, Nepal's problem is not rooted from poverty alone (or rich and poor "classes"), it is also the problem of social unjustice rooted from unequalities between castes, between ethnicities, and between regions. So, they gave the name "Prachanda Path" to their movement to distinguish it from Maoism, Laninism, or Marxism.

agreed with AP98 too.

Agree with AP98 too.. you just can't fix idiots !!and show light to brainwashed people!

loote...
I think in a game of chess....maoist will be a kind of opponent who will cruch your queen literally by the foot and say "I WON"

Looks like everyone is okay with the argument...


so shall i veto it? hehe

LooTe

so shall i veto my argument in another thread too????hahaha.. as if you can veto ..

Kamal Thapa-charitra ka chhepare prajatantra badi haru!! Desh world's poorest nation bhai sakdha pani yini haru ka aakhan phutya-phutyei chhan!!

Longer the time Maoists take to join the govt., lesser the support they will receive from Nepalese when they actually reach the govt/power.

Nobody else except their won cadres gonna support them when mAOISTS will reach the power, if they delay it. Dilemma for Prachanda is whther to reach the govt agreeing everything girija is asking him to do or listen to his own cadres and lose the ground ultimately. For sure, either ways Prachanda and Baburame will be kharani in the history.

we should not have any problem with whether maoists lose the ground or not. The current problem of Nepal, that is, feudalism and aristocracy must be spopped/ended forever with the emergence of just society for every Nepali citizen.

no negotiation with terrorists. gun them.

Maoist are loote role model and he thinks all of the nepalese thinks maoist are the nepalese role mode. LOOTE WAKE UP

...or stupids..

AP98 is right again! let me add that too..or dumb!

I urge you to polish your knowlege a bit on what prachanda path is about. if you have read some of their recent rhetorics, they have clearly stated that Mao Zedong's People's Republic and cooperative party theory cannot fulfill the needs of today's world. it cannot address today's political awareness appropriately. they are into what they call “competitive party theory” which can assure their success in 21st century.

at recent times, they have reiterated that they are up for multiparty democracy. coz they feel that can only assure the longevity of their existence. yes! international support is necessary. that is why they want to mutate from conventional communism. as you say china is a prime example. had they not promoted capitalism, their economic prosperity at status quo would have been only a distant dream. nepal do have resources, all they need is to materialize them and make them sellable.

don't be carried away with incidents where teachers, women and children have been killed. as much as i condemn those acts, i take them as minor discrepancies that come along the way of a revolution. it should be remembered that maoists have always remain as underdogs. everyone tend to look upon underdogs with derogatory approach. so when they do one mistake, it gets magnified like hell. do you have any idea, how many innocents have been killed by NA itself in the last 10 years? do you know how many sufferers were brutally murdered during panchayat era. i am not pointing out another wrong doing to justify a wrong but mishaps do happen during revolutions.

LooTe

argggggg...i wanted to post it in another thread...sorry about that.

Heh, but these things can be done without Maoists/Communists. We don't need communism for some of the things you espouse.
As far as regional autonomy is concerned, why does that sound like segregation?