[VIEWED 23477
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 06-10-09 8:48
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
* आफूहरुले को मन्त्री बनाउने भनेर निर्णय गर्न नसकेका कार्य समितिले आखिर गिरिजा बाबुलाई नै छान्ने अधिकार दिए र उनले नेकामा कनिष्ट आफ्नै छोरी सुजातालाई परराष्ट्र मन्त्री बनाए ब्यापक बिरोध बाबजुद ! त्यो गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र? * त्यसो भए राजीनामा दिन्छु भन्ने शुशिल कोईरालाको खाली घुर्की मात्र रहेछ ! अहिले सम्म उनले राजीनामा दिन नसक्नु गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ? * संसदिय दलको नेता पनि आफै रहि रहनु – अरु नेताको चयन हुन नसक्नु गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ? * मीनेन्द्र रिजाल र महतलाई मन्त्री बनाएर प्रकाशमानलाई पनि देउवाले पाखा लगाए ! सुजाताको बिपक्षमा मौन बन्न लगाई आरजु राणालाई अब केन्द्रिय समितिमा ल्याउने काम गर्दै गर्नु भएका गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ? * माधब नेपाल नामका मात्र प्रधानमन्त्री हुन् – बास्तबिक प्रधानमन्त्री त प्रधानमन्त्री बनाउने गिरिजा बाबु नै हुन् ! यो गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ? * पार्टीको नेता, अभिनेता जे भए पनि आफ्नो कम्पनिको CEO हुन सक्नु त्यो पनि आठौं दशकको बृद्दले - गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ? * योग्य ब्यक्तिहरुलाई पाखा लाउने कार्य गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ? * आफ्ना हरेक मनोकामनाहरु पूरा गर्न सक्ने कुरा गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ? * जस्ले जे सुकै भने पनि बहिरो जस्तो हुनु गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ? कसैले गिरिजा बाबु बिरुद्द केहि गर्न नसक्नु गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ? disclaimer: म कुनै राजनैतिक पार्टीसंग आबद्द भने छैन है ! देख्या, सुन्या, पढ्या, मनमा लाग्या कुरा मात्र राख्या हुं - पब्लिक फिगर रहि रहनु गिरिजा बाबुको सफलता हैन र ?
|
|
|
|
bisal
Please log in to subscribe to bisal's postings.
Posted on 06-10-09 9:41
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Good one bro. I think Only Girija is responsible for the downturn of Nepal. After King Birendra gave up power so easily this azz-hole had majority (it never happened in Nepal after 2017 BS and before 2047 BS). I don’t see in future either. Unfortunately, more instability in coming days.
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 06-10-09 10:00
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
bisal कार्यकर्ता, नेता, जनतालाई back talk मा सिमित पारि दिया छन् - यिनी गिरिजा बाबु सफल होईनन् र आफ्नो राजनितिमा ? देश र पार्टी भांडमा जावोस् !
|
|
|
ctal
Please log in to subscribe to ctal's postings.
Posted on 06-11-09 9:07
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
agreed - successful trader, jasari bhaye pani power ma basne
|
|
|
raju161
Please log in to subscribe to raju161's postings.
Posted on 06-11-09 10:37
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
giriza p. koirala is one of the most clever and monkey minded person in the history of nepalese politics ....for his desire he had done and almost made everything possible at any cost...he is responsible for throwing Lokendra b. Chand from the post of prime minister to once breaking the foundation of Nepali congress for Sher B. Deuba becoming the prime minister ...he mentions that he had already seen that video of Prachanda but he keeps quite for backing Madhav kumar Nepal in the post of Prime minister without any dispute ....provided that he knows that this Govt. won't last long ....
|
|
|
timer
Please log in to subscribe to timer's postings.
Posted on 06-11-09 12:44
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
No, Girija is one not successful, he distroyed Congress, Maoist killed lot of congressi in village, Girija is not a clever monkey, he is just a monkey, see Nepali congress and its karyakarta, they can't go to village or city
|
|
|
notavailable
Please log in to subscribe to notavailable's postings.
Posted on 06-11-09 1:42
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
It depends on how you see things... From Girija's personal point of view, he is successful (as mentioned by shirish) however, after ruling the country for so long, almost 15 years after 2046 revolution, how much did we progress? compared to other country, the country has fallen way behind. Should he not be responsible for how things went so horrible during his tenure? Is he successful that way? the party that has fought for democracy for so long... and still does not have democratic practices within the party itself. Is he not responsible for the dictatorship going on in NC? So the summary, he is successful as a person politically but not as a leader (or people). If i had to choose, i would choose not to live/lead the way he is leading.
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 11:25
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
another success story: कोइरालाविरुद्धको अपहेलना मुद्दा खारेज
कान्तिपुर संवाददाता काठमाडौं, पूर्वप्रधानमन्त्री तथा नेपाली कांग्रेसका सभापति गिरिजाप्रसाद कोइरालाविरुद्ध पाँच वर्षअघि दायर अदालतको अपहेलनासम्बन्धी मुद्दा सर्वोच्च अदालतले बिहीबार खारेज गरेको छ । अख्तियार दुरुपयोग अनुसन्धान आयोगले स्रोत नखुलेको सम्पत्तिको छानबिन सम्बन्धमा काटेको पुर्जीविरुद्ध दायर रिट सर्वोच्चले २०६१ भदौ ३० मा खारेज गरेपछि कोइरालाले अदालतविरुद्ध अभिव्यक्ति दिएका थिए । कोइरालाले 'राजाको प्रत्यक्ष शासनका सामु सर्वोच्च निरीह र विवेकशून्य भएको र सर्वोच्च अदालतलाई नारायणहिटी राजदरबारमा सार्न' भनी अभिव्यक्ति दिएका थिए । न्यायाधीशद्वय दामोदर शर्मा र प्रेम शर्माको संयुक्त इजलासबाट भएको निर्णयमा 'तत्कालीन राजनीतिक परिस्थितिप्रति आक्रोश व्यक्त गर्ने क्रममा अदालत अझ बढी सशक्त, निडर तथा स्वतन्त्र हुनुपर्छ भन्ने धारणाबाट अभिपे्ररित भई तत्काल परिस्थितिलाई इंगित गरी व्यक्त गरेको धारणालाई अपहेलनाको दायराबाट हेर्न नमिल्ने,' उल्लेख छ । तत्कालीन सम्पत्ति जाँचबुझ आयोगको प्रतिवेदनको आधारमा अख्तियारले कोइरालासहित कांग्रेसका अरू नेताहरूसहित ४० उच्च राजनीतिज्ञ, प्रहरी र प्रशासकहरूलाई पुर्जी काटेको थियो । त्यसविरुद्ध कोइरालासहित एक दर्जनले सर्वोच्चमा रिट दायर गरेका थिए । कोइरालाको अभिव्यक्तिले अदालतको मानमर्दन भएको जिकिरसहित अधिवक्ताहरू प्रकाशमणि शर्मा, राजु चापागाईं, टेक ताम्राकार, रमा पन्त खरेल, कविता पाण्डे, कृष्ण मुल्मीलगायतले संयुक्त रूपमा अपहेलनासम्बन्धी मुद्दा दायर गरेका थिए ।
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 11:42
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
ctal,
the ultimate to be in politics is "POWER" by any means and Koirala is very successful.
Raju161,
Prachanda offere PMship to Koirala but he denied. Here is his game plan (my assumption). For NC to come to power with full majority in next election - UML is on the way. Maoists have been proven as failure. What ever UML has as "impressions" need to be broken. By bringing UML into power, he is tarnishing the image of UML. Is not this a clever game plan of Girija Babu?
Already Girija Babu brought Sujata in lime light. She will have stronger portfolio in NC's majority government after next election.
timer,
The leaders and cadres of NC are lot smarter, dedicated and knowledgable than you are. They (except some) simply accept what Girija Babu does. He is so successful and powerful, very few organizations, leaders and cadre to raise voice against him. Have you heard even foreign based organizations voicing against "sujata's nomination" - No right ! (except one in Germany !!)
All politics are local - so not being able to go to villages is a local problem - NOT Girija babu's problem !! Chetana Bhaya ???
notavailable,
thats what I meant - he is very successful on what he wants - not what the people want and need.
A successful leader follows people !! But Girija Babu has led people successfully !
Last edited: 12-Jun-09 11:59 AM
|
|
|
Poon-Hill
Please log in to subscribe to Poon-Hill's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 11:45
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
Girija is THE Sati's curse to our country. Our whole generation got doomed in this azz-hole's greedness. He won't die easily either.
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 11:56
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Well Poon-Hill, you are dead wrong. Do you think people who work under his leadership are dumb, indifferent, ignorant? There are so many able and well educated people. If they think Girija Babu is good - you better change your thought process. If he is/was like what you are thinking, why would not people raise voice against him? Why not a revolution? He is not Saddam Hussain or Kim Jung Il who would chop heads of opponents.
|
|
|
timer
Please log in to subscribe to timer's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 1:19
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
shirish, Funny analysis, "The leaders and cadres of NC are lot smarter, dedicated and knowledgable than you are". Please look yourself first before comparing others, I don't want to compare myself to others. It is a bare fact, it doesn't mean I hate congress or support but the people like you who supports blindly to someone had spoiled the country, Girija is not only bad for country but also for the its own supporters, because many people were killed just they are supporters of Nepali Congress and you can see the defeat of Nepali congress every where. As education is concerned, it is not only the congress supporters are educated than others, they use their education to cheat people, to be currupt and to make a base for civil war.
|
|
|
raju161
Please log in to subscribe to raju161's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 2:10
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
i support your every view shirish believe me with the fall of Giriza P koirala Nepal will definitely embrace communism .....the only reason the democracy is hanging in Nepal is because of him ...the most influencial and powerful person next to him at the present context of our country i see is Prachanda !! it is evident ...how smart is giriza he single handedly acting as the opposition group brought the maoist government to the floor ....i know with his fall Prachanda will definitely rise
|
|
|
timer
Please log in to subscribe to timer's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 2:37
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Sorry Raju161, Girija is fertilizing more communism than before and more preparing more extremist, just compare before UML with soft corner were there but after democracy and rise of Girija, more hard liner like Maoist developed, you are totally wrong, because of the wrong analysis, King went and almost all Maoist is in power, it is not because of Girija that extremist are stopped but they are fertilized!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
raju161
Please log in to subscribe to raju161's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 2:45
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
time please this time too i suggest you to understand the fact and run low on emotions ....look the examples around! ....don't talk about uml they never walked by themselves also now they need someone's support to exist in the government u should know the condition of makune right now /..i didn't mentioned extremist do i? why did you bring this word ?
|
|
|
timer
Please log in to subscribe to timer's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 3:17
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I mean Extremist as Maoist!!
|
|
|
raju161
Please log in to subscribe to raju161's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 3:28
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Timer tell me one thing do you sleep six month and again wake up for next six month!! why are you so poor in analyzing all the facts? So you say maoist are extremist and what you think if nepali congress had not stayed as a opposition group and obstructed all their plans don't you think maoist as you called Extremist would be in power right now? provided that UML are daichuire as u call in Nepali and Madhese they are the same !! get some thinking
Good night
|
|
|
timer
Please log in to subscribe to timer's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 3:38
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Funny Raju161, it is not in the time of cold war where world is divided, it is after the fall of communist dynasty in the world and Maoist is one of the biggest threat and biggest movement in this time. So, it is not easy to be in power as in cold war where world had been divided but because of Girija and his dynasty they had almost size the power from king, congress and now they are the super power. Ya, sorry, I don't know who is analyzing right, I might not be as smart as you, it is a bare fact.
|
|
|
nepalichora
Please log in to subscribe to nepalichora's postings.
Posted on 06-12-09 9:33
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Nepalese politics and the leaders are created and governed by Delhi, its a hard fact since 1950s. After Ranas the pride of this small nation and economic condition gradually deteriorated. In those days we were in the 27th position below the poverty line. If Somalia would not have been there our position would be the first in this twenty first century. No national leader dedicated for the nation and the people have emerged yet. The exception was King Mahendra when he saved the nation from direct Delhi rule, gradually by sending Indian troops and started governing independent foreign policy and stopped Indian intervention and direct Indian rule for which he faced lots of trouble by Indians in the name of Nepali Congress as long as he lived. Mahendra proved himself by his deeds that he had Nationalistic approach. Kodari as well as Mahendra Raj Marga was his dream came true but he was also not able to counter Indian design completely due to lack of nationalistic leaders who could have faced Indian challenge from the grass root level. Still then he introduced Panchayat system which was defamed by his predecessor Late King Birendra and failed. The way seven parties signed twelve point understanding again in Delhi has given Delhi a upper hand in Nepalese politics. Again India started to play directly in Nepalese politics like they were used to from 1950s due to these parties and its leaders. The way "ganantra" is handled when Bamdev Gautam who lost in the election became the first deputy PM, Madhav Nepal who lost from two constituencies became the PM and Sujata who lost miserably in the election is a foreign minister, Bidya Bhandari is also an election looser is now the defense minister; clearly indicates that there is no need of election in Nepal and we are still too immature to call our self a democratic country. When we could not judge the conduct of the leaders who ruled since 2046 (Bikram Sambat) and are the only commanding factor in national politics, who bitterly failed since those years in governing the nation again and again. Without strong opposition democracy does not survive and there is no strong opposition in this country that's why to save this nation from Indian hegemony a strong leader like Junga Bahadur is a must for this country?? When all the parties were in favor of granting non-Nepalese citizenship to five million Indians then what is the need to call this nation a nation and give people hardship and harassment everyday?? These same leaders used to say that they are immature in governing and cannot say when this interim period will end? Will they ever be responsible??
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 06-19-09 8:03
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
..
|
|