[VIEWED 25702
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
at_its_best
Please log in to subscribe to at_its_best's postings.
Posted on 03-21-11 4:59
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
One of my fren is denied from re-entering US and is now deported and is back to Nepal. There were no criminal charges or cases against him while he was here. He was about to graduate in few semesters and had good GPA overall. Officers saw his picture while at work in his cell fone and stuffs started from there. I am just trying to know; what he needs to do to re-enter united states.
Last edited: 21-Mar-11 05:01 AM
|
|
|
|
Dukhe.
Please log in to subscribe to Dukhe's postings.
Posted on 03-22-11 8:44
AM [Snapshot: 2710]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Ur gf ni spring brk Mai Nepal gako ho merajay? Achamma cha ta yar
|
|
|
terobaaje
Please log in to subscribe to terobaaje's postings.
Posted on 03-22-11 9:36
AM [Snapshot: 2787]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
@ riten......I think they know when people use their social security number that says work authorization by INS only. SS number is not a work permit, although you paid taxes etc it is considered a federal offense and Thats how they normally track people at the port of entry....................i think. I dont think they can track people who work for cash.
Last edited: 22-Mar-11 09:37 AM
|
|
|
Riten
Please log in to subscribe to Riten's postings.
Posted on 03-22-11 9:40
AM [Snapshot: 2800]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Thanks terobajey. But I keep hearing that there is no connection between IRS and INS, one cannot look up the other's database, etc. So even if the person worked using his or her SS# and had taxes withheld, how would INS know? I am just curious. Sorry if I am belaboring this.
|
|
|
at_its_best
Please log in to subscribe to at_its_best's postings.
Posted on 03-22-11 9:47
AM [Snapshot: 2839]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
every one doesnt have semesters in college some have quarters too jan to march is a quarter!!!
|
|
|
terobaaje
Please log in to subscribe to terobaaje's postings.
Posted on 03-22-11 10:08
AM [Snapshot: 2839]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
well there isnt any direct relation with the two irs and ins but because of the terrorist attacks and the country being at war.......they are releasing suspicious people working illegally to the port of entry authority and police for further investigation, these people are reported and are already in their database and a quick check will get them busted....
|
|
|
ktm_usa
Please log in to subscribe to ktm_usa's postings.
Posted on 03-22-11 7:54
PM [Snapshot: 3687]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
waiyaat kura nagar [Disallowed String for - use not allowed]...tato na chaaro....ko maanche ho tyo..deport bhayeko maanche ko naam k ho..usko email address k ho?
|
|
|
KnockKnock
Please log in to subscribe to KnockKnock's postings.
Posted on 03-22-11 9:58
PM [Snapshot: 3946]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
To make the long story short, could you ask your buddy on what ground he was considered to be inadmissible?
From tids-bits of your story, I am assuming ‘212(a)(6)(C)(i)’ = Misrepresentation . As you mentioned, ….indian officer dude and he said “ Jo bhi hai sach bataao….”
Now earlier you mentioned “ Officers saw his picture while at work in his cell fone and stuffs started from there….”….I personally don’t buy this story, but just for a moment let’s assume this is true…
Federal regulation does put the burden on the alien to satisfy the examining immigration officer of the claim of lawful admission……however if the immigration officer thinks the person is inadmissible then the burden is on them to show/prove it….there is whole bunch of process involved in it, and just phone pictures would not prove anything……what made the immigration officer think..there was misrepresentation of info?…..Only, if they have a cause to believe that there is in-fact a misrepresentation of info, they would probably check other docs, may be phone, laptop……they would probably have a statement, some sort of form with their side of facts and evidence…and your buddy statement…they should have probably given him some sort of number/code for which the grounds of inadmissibility has been proven……
I don’t know much about Laws, but with tids-bits information, no one can give a proper suggestion.....with little details, you are leaving things on our imagination to fill the gap of details, and trust me in this way your buddy will not get any reliable advice through sajha…
If your buddy does not want to share other info. getting a lawyer is the only option….cause rules/ regulations gets very tricky….there might be a waiver form that can be of help….
|
|