[VIEWED 22124
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 04-11-08 9:53
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
1. Pradip Nepal ( I think he is an intellectual. Much needed voice in the constituent assembly)
|
|
|
|
GP
Please log in to subscribe to GP's postings.
Posted on 04-13-08 9:13
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Shirish,
Having Koirala as President, Maoists will have easy access to American Embassy to make their constitution legitimate, and Koirala may help remove the Terrorist tag. It is strategic.
GP
|
|
|
Ok
Please log in to subscribe to Ok's postings.
Posted on 04-13-08 9:28
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I am confused with some of the sentences written by Nepali Newspapers and also here in Sajha, examples: "landslide win of the Maoist" or "Maoists near 2/3 majority" etc.
My observation is quite opposite. Correct me if I am wrong!
Even if the current trend continues, Maoists won't have even a "simple majority" in CA. Since CA composed of 240 seats (FPTP) + 330 (PR) + 31 (nominated, probably by Girija Prasad Koirala, before Maoist takes charge of the government). My predictions for the Maoists are:
1. They take up to 140 seats out of 240 FPTP seats (58% maximum)
2. They will have one third of the total votes in PR: 110 seats (33%)
3. Total seats they will have= 250 out of 601 seat CA (41.6%)
Even if 31 nominated seats goes to them (which is unlikely!), they will have 281 seats out of 601-seat CA (Maximum of 46.8%).
Am I right ?
OK
|
|
|
Nepe
Please log in to subscribe to Nepe's postings.
Posted on 04-13-08 9:52
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Shirish,
It’s all speculative. Yours is as good as mine.
The legitimacy thing is an old theory (it’s running for three years already), which still might be valid.
However, I think there are two new factors that might mitigate it.
One, the popular legitimacy Maoist just earned. Then, looking at the pattern (Koiralas’ or NC’s performance in the election), it looks like the voters will be deeply disappointed if Maoist crowns the same old man again. Voters wanted change at any cost. They did not care about lejitimesi sejitimesi. If they cared about this imaginary thing called lejitimesi, they wouldn’t vote the way they did.
So, rewarding Koirala might work against Maoist actually.
A popular image like the victorious Narahari Acharya instead of morally defeated and indirectly rejected face like GP Koirala might win the both fronts, the voters and the international community.
Make that three fronts. This Nepe will be happy too.
So I am curious to see how Maoist would assess the value of GP Koirala and read voters’ mind.
Nepe
|
|
|
Nepe
Please log in to subscribe to Nepe's postings.
Posted on 04-13-08 10:10
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
OK-jee,
You are right. 2/3 is extremely unlikey. They will get a simple majority or, as you are speculating, simply the largest majority. However, that will be enough for them to rule or dominate.
Nepe
|
|
|
Nepe
Please log in to subscribe to Nepe's postings.
Posted on 04-13-08 10:12
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I voted.. sorry.. posted twice. deleting it.
Last edited: 13-Apr-08 10:16 PM
|
|
|
Captain Haddock
Please log in to subscribe to Captain Haddock's postings.
Posted on 04-13-08 10:13
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Like Nepe said it's still fluid, but the Maoists have become the predominant party changing the inter party dynamics significantly regardless of what the final outcome is. There are some check and balances built into the CA so I agree the Maoists will find it difficult to run amuck but, no brainer, the extent of their power will depend on the finally tally. In my opinion, the Congress or UML should support the government from the outside (but I doubt they can resist the temptations of power )
|
|
|
Nepe
Please log in to subscribe to Nepe's postings.
Posted on 04-13-08 10:30
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Captain,
The lust for the warmth of kursi, on one hand ,and Maoist’s need for more people knowing knots and bolts of the government, on the other, might work towards making the opposition vacant.
But that might be good for the civil societies and NGOs. They might get the job. ;-)
Nepe
|
|
|
Captain Haddock
Please log in to subscribe to Captain Haddock's postings.
Posted on 04-13-08 10:44
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Ha ha, Nepe, maybe I should apply for that position since no one else seems interested in it - LOL! Strictly in jest.
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 04-14-08 12:01
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Correction: Ram Sharan Mahat won by 104 votes
|
|
|
AX
Please log in to subscribe to AX's postings.
Posted on 04-14-08 12:37
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Shirish, you mentioned about Maiya Devi Shrestha. I don't know how much you know about her. She is 80+ and she got the ticket because she gives money and land as a donation to NC. She is from my tole and I have yet to see her do one thing to our tole or Bharatpur Nagarpalika -3.
I am sure almost everybody knew she was going to lose to UML not Maoist. In previous election, she got ticket from Gorkha. I hope Chitwane NC learned the lesson from this election.
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 04-14-08 1:52
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
AX I have heard about her. Unfortunately, in elections, heads are counted not the contents. She has been a very philanthropic lady but I sincerely don't know her potentials for the contributions for making a new constitution which will determine the future of the country. Voting on the basis of emotions, looks or mere slogans, is not a good idea. (but in reality it happens - it happens in US too). In the past, some well known figures have made mistakes in writing constitution. Hope fully Prachand will realize this and minimize the potential mistakes by hiring experts from international arena. Its again unfortunate that some of the people who lost could have been very valuable asset. I have heard that Jhakku Prasad's credentials so People did not realize or do not have the capability to realize what and why they are electing for. Garo cha yaar !!
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 04-19-08 11:37
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 04-20-08 8:14
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|