[VIEWED 19666
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
chikat
Please log in to subscribe to chikat's postings.
Posted on 03-11-08 5:45
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Well, I was just wondering that in the April uprising 2006 hardly any Tibetans came to support the movement. Therefore here are some stupid Questions, 1. Now, since Nepal is a secular state, why are the Tibetans coming with their movement now?? Y didn't they join hands with us in the April movement to support us? 2. Do they deserve to do their movement? 3. Do they realize how much pain and suffering we Nepalese had to take to free our country from dominant rule and why didn't they join us?? they were merely living in their high business earned homes enjoying themselves to the fullest and laughing at our country each time someone got booted by the cops. 4. If Gyanendra still had the powers, would the Tibetan do their movement? 5. We still have many movements going on in our country. Does this Tibetan movement bring about more chakka jam and waste of government money? and waste of time ?? and waste of Nepali people who wants to keep their shops open?? WATS YOUR OPINION???
Last edited: 11-Mar-08 05:49 PM
|
|
|
|
outlandish
Please log in to subscribe to outlandish's postings.
Posted on 03-13-08 8:42
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
C'mon people, let's refrain from attacking each other's ethnicities and keep this discussion as civilized as possible. We're all Nepalese,aren't we?? Peace brothers!
|
|
|
Sajha_Lawyer
Please log in to subscribe to Sajha_Lawyer's postings.
Posted on 03-14-08 2:36
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Who needs free Tibet and why? I guess we Nepalese people o not free Tibet. Now, Tibetan Refugee in Nepal are mixing religion and politics and that is not tolerated by Nepalese Govt. They can not shout Free Tibet Slogan at the public religious place like Swayambhu and again, Nepal Govt. has this policy of not allowing any forces to do any such activities that is targetted against Friendly Nation's sovereignty in Nepalese land. Tibetan can go to Tibet and can do anything they want but not in Nepal.
|
|
|
BathroomCoffee
Please log in to subscribe to BathroomCoffee's postings.
Posted on 03-14-08 2:57
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Man SajhaLawyer,"They can not shout Free Tibet Slogan at the public religious place like Swayambhu and again, Nepal Govt. has this policy of not allowing any forces to do any such activities that is targetted against Friendly Nation's sovereignty in Nepalese land." SAY WHO YOU ? ha ha ha nahasa na GADHA !!! U NEED TO STOP TALKING OUT OF YOUR ASS!!! Tyo Nepal ma DOOUKWASHI lyayeko kina ta ? Peaceful protest is a form of freedom of speech. YOU CANNOT BE SELECTIVE ON WHO CAN AND CANNOT SPEAK FREELY IN NEPAL. Tyetro ragat baghayo tyo doooukwashi lyauna pherii yo ban garney tyo ban garney kuraa garcha baa yo gadha !!! But not in Nepal rey ? Pheriii ayooo arkooo gadhaa. Nepali haru chahi Australia, England, USA, Dubai, ma gayera Gyaney Chor Desh Chood Bhanera karaunu huney rey !! Aru lai chahi Nepal ma ayera peaceful demonstrate garnu nahuney ? What sort of fugged up logic is that ?
|
|
|
Captain Haddock
Please log in to subscribe to Captain Haddock's postings.
Posted on 03-14-08 3:11
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
They have a right to protest and if those protests are peaceful, which they have been for the most part, there is a lot we can learn from them about peaceful protests. When Nepalese protest, we protest like maniacs burning down telephone booths, smashing cars, vandalizing public property etc. There might have been some of that in Lhasa but I give the protesters full credit for keeping things mostly under control in Kathmandu. The more interesting question is whether Tibetan independence is a good thing for Nepal. Sure the Dalai Lama does not seek full independence, but should Tibet ever become independent, what does that mean for Nepal? Are we better off, worse off or unaffected by an independent Tibet? Food for thought.
|
|
|
mta177
Please log in to subscribe to mta177's postings.
Posted on 03-14-08 4:10
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Tibetans have full rights to protest not only in Nepal but thoroughout the world againsts Chinese Government. This is the right time so that their voice can be heared by the rest of the world. Chinese Government doesn't even give rights to its own people, there is no way that Chinese Govt.will give rights to Tibetans. Chinese don't have rights on anything from family planning to sports. It was on MSNBC documentary about Yao Ming about 3 years ago or so, Yao Ming has to give $20,000,000 to Chinese Govt every year so that he can play basketball in US. Not only him all the chinese athlets have to give 100% of their earnings to the government. The Govt. takes away young kids from their families to train for years and they are allowed to see their families once or twice a year. They don't get nothing in return. Those families get little bit more benefits than others. It was in CNN report on Planet in Peril by Anderson Cooper and Dr. Sanjay Gupta that the villagers are dying of cancers because of the polutated water from the industries. Govt. covered it up. Not only that Jerry Yang the CEO of Yahoo reported Chinese Govt againsts two chinese reportes who wrote againsts Govt. Now they are in jail.Chinese people need Visa to go from one place to another. Is that democracy? I don't know how long the chinese Govt. last but sooner or later it will blast. My point is Tibetans are free to protest in Nepal againsts Chinese evil Govt.
|
|