First of all they try to make sensation out of the death of a human being to make their living. Then they go one step beyond to prove what kind of leeches they are

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdJfmjC2TJs

This video seriously makes me angry. What a jerk.

I wonder why didn't anyone step up and smash their camera immediately?
I would have done it in a heartbeat.

People who are promoting this video as "Nisha adhikari's controversy speech" are dumb. This video should be promoted as an example of what kind of video sucks Stupid F%$&& Journalist

Where is journalistic ethics when taking pictures of a dead man so openly without the permission of the family? I guess these morons think that a camera in hand is what's needed to be a journalist. Shame on you voltures.

I understand the sentiments. But I wonder if it really is a bad journalism or against ethical norms. If the family had requested not to be photographed/recorded then that's a different story, but journals will flock to a celebrity as long as they are out in the public. Was it really wrong for the journals to do so? I really don't have any opinion on this, I am just curious.

Agree with Kiddo. There's nothing bad on taking the picture of record the video during the funeral. Either journalists should not be allowed at all or once they're allowed one should let them do their job. If photo journalist starts attaching sentiments with every other accident, death and funeral than what's the point of carrying the camera and following journalism.

@Kiddo, I don't mind the presence of media in this funeral. And I totally agree with Nisha's frustation. BUT my question is why was Nisha's frustration so much of a big issue to this particular "tori laure" journalist that he broadcasted a whole segment disagreeing how Nisha reacted? वाहियात र घटिया किसिम को पत्रकारिताको नमुना हो यो।

This is nothing but sensationalization of celebrities. There was no need to re-re-peat that word spoken by Nisha Adhikari. These journalist will resort to re-repeating non sensical words that can be ambiguous to sensationalize the crowd at hand.

By the way, which channel broadcasted this? Do we have journalist's name or channel's name maybe? Any clue, anybody? यो निम्न सोचाइ भएको पत्रकार हो। शायद यस्मा अलिकती सम्बेदनशीलता आएको भये यो Kevin Carter हुन्थ्यो होला। My bad, एस्तो low life लाई Kevin Carter सँग तुलना गर्न पुगेछु। थुक्क म!

That I agree with you Tyrion. I think it's the heavy influence from Indian media and even some of the Western media. They have nothing to show and want to stretch a small piece of reporting so they just keep repeating the same thing. They make big thing out of everything. This is what happens when you have too many channels and too much time to fill with mediocre reporting staff (both in quantity and quality).